An AI avatar tried to argue a case before a New York court. The judges weren’t having it
By LARRY NEUMEISTER
NEW YORK (AP) — It took only seconds for the judges on a New York appeals court to realize that the man addressing them from a video screen — a person about to present an argument in a lawsuit — not only had no law degree, but didn’t exist at all.
Related Articles
-
Awarding state arts grants in Florida: Republican lawmakers make changes to DeSantis proposal -
Today in History: April 5, FDR establishes Civilian Conservation Corps -
LA County reaches $4 billion agreement to settle sexual abuse claims at juvenile facilities -
Chevron ordered to pay more than $740 million to restore Louisiana coast in landmark trial -
Think twice before bailing out of the stock market, financial advisers say
The latest bizarre chapter in the awkward arrival of artificial intelligence in the legal world unfolded March 26 under the stained-glass dome of New York State Supreme Court Appellate Division’s First Judicial Department, where a panel of judges was set to hear from Jerome Dewald, a plaintiff in an employment dispute.
